|
Bush et al. committed fraud against the United States by lying to congress to obtain congressional authority to wage war against a nation, Iraq, which was not an imminent threat to U.S., and by thereafter ordering American servicemen and women to fight in Iraq, knowing that some would be killed, Bush et. Bush, Richard B. Bush: One Lawyer's Campaign to Bring the President to Justice and the National Grassroots Movement She Encounters Along the Way by Charlotte DennettBecause these three excellent books, each dealing with prosecuting George W. He establishes that the U.S.
The defendants are George W. by Elizabeth de la Vega(PBM) The Prosecution of George W. Bush, Richard Chaney, and others for crimes they committed between 2001 and 2008, nicely complement each other, it seems appropriate to review them together.USvB, the shortest* and first to be written (© 2006), is an account of a fictional but realistic presentation to a grand jury of an indictment for "Conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371." (p. The fact that Bush used Iraqis as instruments to commit those murders instead of performing them personally is not a legal defense, any more than it would have been had he hired contract killers to do his dirty work.PvB, the most recent (© 2010) is a partial autobiography of Charlotte Dennett, who ran for Attorney General of Vermont, promising, if elected, to prosecute Bush for the murders of Vermonters who had been killed in Bush's illegal war. George W.
al. Attorney General, or the attorney general of any state, or the district attorney of any county of which a resident has been killed in G.W. As the title suggests, Bugliosi presents a very strong case for the conviction of Bush (and Cheney, Rice, Rove, and Rumsfeld, at least) for murder in the deaths of the more than 4000 American servicemen who have been killed in Iraq. 27).
Chaney, Condoleezza Rice, Donald M. As Attorney General, Sorrell knew, or should have known, that Vermont did, in fact have that jurisdiction, but his lie was widely quoted by Vermont news media, while they declined to report Dennett's reply that established that Vermont did indeed have jurisdiction. (USvB) United States v. Bush's Iraq war, has jurisdiction to prosecute, and he establishes that because Bush, Cheney, et. al. knowingly and intentionally and unlawfully caused the deaths of Americans. Powell It was written by an experienced former federal prosecutor. So many, probably most voters, were left with the erroneous impression that she didn't know what she was talking about, and thus presumably was incompetent to be Attorney General.
Bush for Murder by Vincent Bugliosi(PvB) The People V. Any one two, or all three of these books are well worth reading, and should be in every school, college, or public library. Rumsfeld, and Colin M. Albeit the witnesses presented to the fictional grand jury are fictional, the facts they testify to are real.All three are well-written, but because it is mostly narrative, some may find USvB easier reading.PBM, the second to be written (© 2008) is the longest* of the three, albeit Bugliosi repeats himself quite a bit, I assume because he has found it effective in making presentations to juries to reemphasize the important points often. She lost the election, in part because her incumbent opponent, William Sorrell, dismissed her with a false statement that she could not prosecute because the State of Vermont had no jurisdiction. * I have determined, by counting samples of each, that the amount of text in the three books is approximately in the ratio USvB:PvB:PBM :: 4:7:8 watziznaym@gmail.com
THIS BOOK PROVIDED THE ACTUAL QUOTES (LIES)THAT BUSH PROVIDED TO JUSTIFY LEADING US INTO WAR.
But, this is America; a land where we embrace free speech, right. But it is difficult to fault him for his passion. Most Americans would say the audacity for another American to make such a charge against their President is at the very least unpatriotic if not treasonous. A very tall order even in the current polarized political climate. From the outset, Mr. A man is innocent until proven guilty, however they would have a very difficult time taking down Mr. Bugliosi stands politically and he does get very personal in his attacks of the administration. His case is built slowly and methodically drawing the reader down the path to what he believes is the only logical conclusion.It is very clear where Mr.
Lee Bailey to write "The Defense of George W. Mr. Bugliosi asks the reader to keep his mind open while he presents, what is in his opinion, the legal framework and supporting evidence to prosecute the President of The United of States of America for murder. My wish is for someone like F. Disagree and ridicule his writing style, his tone, his conclusion, but you cannot say his facts are inaccurate. Bugliosi succeeds brilliantly in using the meticulously documented, undisputed facts to build and support his case. Bush on the Charge of Murder". Bugliosi.
The Prosecution of Vincent Bugliosi for Treason would be a much more realistic book. Unless Mrs. Why. Whomever might write it would have ALL the facts. Bugliosi has access to information that he will never have access to, and has actually tested his theories against a vigorous defense, then he should keep his fantasies to himself. Anyone can make a case for anything if there is no rebuttal, which only emphasizes his cowardice treason.
Then and only then, try to reconcile the two. We "Christian" Americans are analogous to King Theoden, Grima is Sean Hannity (and Bill O'Reilly) while Fox News is the dreaded Eye of Sauron - built by Roger Ailes expressly for the advance of greed and power over all attempts to suppress their combined conquest of the Earth. When Gandolf comes to awaken us from our delusions his disposition appears immoderate, hateful, or even violent, but these are all words that Grima would use to describe Gandolf at his approach. Shall we slumber like Theoden. Turn off Fox and read his book. The Patriot Act is the bomb placed under the wall. Our Constitution is like Helm's Deep - the last hope for open, representative government.
The Neocons are the mutant earth-born Uruk hai who beat the drums of war and carry the bomb under the wall. In order to protect themselves, they must keep Theoden stupid, corrupt all his guards and they must destroy or neutralize Helm's deep. Vincent Bugliosi reminds me of Gandolf in the Two Towers scene when he undertakes the task of breaking the spell that Grima has cast on Theoden. Gandolf wants to give Theoden his mind and his soul back.Unlike the movie though, there is no wizard with a stick and magical esoterica. Just a guy with a book who knows a murder when he sees one. Try this. What has it done to us. Think of how many hours we have all spent basked in that terrible glow.
We are like Theoden because we have been talked out of almost every founding ideal and have become religiously "Laodicean"; wretched, miserable, poor, blind and naked. Ask your self which one, Fox TV or Vincent Bugliosi is more like Grima, and which is more like Gandolf. "Who is HE to so abuse our slumbering king", they might object. Grima would shout "this is heresy, dangerous rebellion or ANARCHY." But Gandolf only wishes to restore Theoden's original perception, abilities, strength and status. But just as Gandolf had to get right up close and in the King's face to speak his words and break the spell, you cannot do this test without reading the book. If Bugliosi seems at first like a madman, maybe that is because we have become like Theoden: dumbed, dulled and insensate to what our country has been doing in our name, and through our collective power.
|
